Oh boy, it's hypocrisy time. I can't wait to see how many people who thought it was "perfectly fine" for Hillary to use completely insecure means and private emails, devices and even server to share confidential information while Secretary of State are suddenly shouting "Lock him up" and "Kushner for Prison."
Here's the thing, I personally don't trust Kushner as far as I can throw him. Despite Trump's appearance, it's very telling that our President is so willing to put so much faith and power in the hands of a man who is known to be <strong>IN DEEP</strong> with the Soros camp. While Trump supporters called out Hillary Clinton's close connections to Goldman Sachs, it was only recently disclosed that <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/jared-kushner-ties-george-soros-goldman-sachs-peter-thiel-1-billion-loan-2017-5">Kushner is also very closely linked to the firm as well.</a>
<a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/352163-kushner-used-private-email-for-white-house-work-report">Kushner's email insecurity issue</a> is especially ironic considering how much guff the Trump camp gave Hillary for doing the same. The issue of double-standards extends further than just the emails. Kushner, who has been named a "person of interest" in the Robert Mueller led investigation into possible Russian interference in the election.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">GRASSLEY on CLINTON (thus KUSHNER): "She was using private email instead of gov't email. It probably violates FOIA and NatSec legislation." <a href="https://t.co/xdjByAspHS">pic.twitter.com/xdjByAspHS</a></p>— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/912059670092763136">September 24, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
When you consider the fact that the Trumps and Clintons have been friends and business partners for going on a quarter century now it's a lot less surprising that there would be so much crossover behind the powerful forces jockeying them about. Suspicious reporters from both the right and the left have considered the possibility that Trump may have been a Clinton/Koch plant <a href="http://thehill.com/opinion/brent-budowsky/250445-brent-budowsky-is-trump-a-clinton-plant">as far back as 2015</a>.