A Google Software Engineer, who's traditional and right leaning in nature, has passed around a ten-page document that Exposes the corruption and bigoted hiring practices against conservatives and right wing individuals inside of Google.
The memo has gone viral circulating all across the ranks of Google, ending over a decade's worth of silence about the taboo in mentioning how biased Google actually is in choosing “diversity” over skills in promotion, hiring, and strategic planning.
The right is furious at the way they've been treated, and this document clearly displays the voice of reason for the people who for far too long have had a gag order over their ideological opinions or beliefs.
Google is currently in the midst of a major <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/07/google-pay-disparities-women-labor-department-lawsuit">Pay Discrimination Lawsuit</a> and investigation by the United States Department of Labor.
In the groundbreaking and brazen memo which has gone viral, the author argues that women are underrepresented in tech not because they face bias and discrimination in the workplace, but because of inherent psychological differences between men and women. “We need to stop assuming that gender gaps imply sexism,” he writes, going on to argue that Google’s educational programs for young women may be misguided.
Here's the full and complete transcripts of the memorandum:
<strong>Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber</strong>
<i>”Reply to public response and misrepresentation”</i>
<i>”I value diversity and inclusion, am not denying that sexism exists, and don’t endorse using stereotypes. When addressing the gap in representation in the population, we need to look at population level differences in distributions. If we can’t have an honest discussion about this, then we can never truly solve the problem. Psychological safety is built on mutual respect and acceptance, but unfortunately our culture of shaming and misrepresentation is disrespectful and unaccepting of anyone outside its echo chamber. Despite what the public response seems to have been, I’ve gotten many personal messages from fellow Googlers expressing their gratitude for bringing up these very important issues which they agree with but would never have the courage to say or defend because of our shaming culture and the possibility of being fired. This needs to change.”</i>
<i>”Google’s political bias has equated the freedom from offense with psychological safety, but shaming into silence is the antithesis of psychological safety.”</i>
<i>”This silencing has created an ideological echo chamber where some ideas are too sacred to be honestly discussed.”</i>
<i>”The lack of discussion fosters the most extreme and authoritarian elements of this ideology.”</i>
<i>”Extreme: all disparities in representation are due to oppression.”</i>
<i>”Authoritarian: we should discriminate to correct for this oppression.”</i>
<i>”Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don’t have 50% representation of women in tech and leadership. Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, and bad for business.”</i>
<i>”People generally have good intentions, but we all have biases which are invisible to us. Thankfully, open and honest discussion with those who disagree can highlight our blind spots and help us grow, which is why I wrote this document. Google has several biases and honest discussion about these biases is being silenced by the dominant ideology. What follows is by no means the complete story, but it’s a perspective that desperately needs to be told at Google.”</i>
<i>”At Google, we talk so much about unconscious bias as it applies to race and gender, but we rarely discuss our moral biases. Political orientation is actually a result of deep moral preferences and thus biases. Considering that the overwhelming majority of the social sciences, media, and Google lean left, we should critically examine these prejudices.”</i>
Compassion for the weak
Disparities are due to injustices
Humans are inherently cooperative
Change is good (unstable)
<i>”Respect for the strong/authority
Disparities are natural and just
Humans are inherently competitive
Change is dangerous (stable)
<i>”Neither side is 100% correct and both viewpoints are necessary for a functioning society or, in this case, company. A company too far to the right may be slow to react, overly hierarchical, and untrusting of others. In contrast, a company too far to the left will constantly be changing (deprecating much loved services), over diversify its interests (ignoring or being ashamed of its core business), and overly trust its employees and competitors.”</i>
<i>”Only facts and reason can shed light on these biases, but when it comes to diversity and inclusion, Google’s left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence. This silence removes any checks against encroaching extremist and authoritarian policies. For the rest of this document, I’ll concentrate on the extreme stance that all differences in outcome are due to differential treatment and the authoritarian element that’s required to actually discriminate to create equal representation.”</i>
<i>”Possible non-bias causes of the gender gap in tech ”</i>
<i>”At Google, we’re regularly told that implicit (unconscious) and explicit biases are holding women back in tech and leadership. Of course, men and women experience bias, tech, and the workplace differently and we should be cognizant of this, but it’s far from the whole story.”</i>
<i>”On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. These differences aren’t just socially constructed because:
They’re universal across human cultures
They often have clear biological causes and links to prenatal testosterone.”</i>
<i>”Biological males that were castrated at birth and raised as females often still identify and act like males.”</i>
<i>”The underlying traits are highly heritable
They’re exactly what we would predict from an evolutionary psychology perspective.”</i>
<i>”Note, I’m not saying that all men differ from women in the following ways or that these differences are “just.” I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. Many of these differences are small and there’s significant overlap between men and women, so you can’t say anything about an individual given these population level distributions.”</i>
<i>”Women, on average, have more:
Openness directed towards feelings and aesthetics rather than ideas. Women generally also have a stronger interest in people rather than things, relative to men (also interpreted as empathizing vs. systemizing).”</i>
<i>”These two differences in part explain why women relatively prefer jobs in social or artistic areas. More men may like coding because it requires systemizing and even within SWEs, comparatively more women work on front end, which deals with both people and aesthetics.”</i>
<i>”Extraversion expressed as gregariousness rather than assertiveness. Also, higher agreeableness.”</i>
<i>”This leads to women generally having a harder time negotiating salary, asking for raises, speaking up, and leading. Note that these are just average differences and there’s overlap between men and women, but this is seen solely as a women’s issue. This leads to exclusory programs like Stretch and swaths of men without support.”</i>
<i>”Neuroticism (higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance).This may contribute to the higher levels of anxiety women report on Googlegeist and to the lower number of women in high stress jobs.”</i>
<i>”Note that contrary to what a social constructionist would argue, research suggests that “greater nation-level gender equality leads to psychological dissimilarity in men’s and women’s personality traits.””</i>
<i>”Because as “society becomes more prosperous and more egalitarian, innate dispositional differences between men and women have more space to develop and the gap that exists between men and women in their personality becomes wider.” We need to stop assuming that gender gaps imply sexism.”</i>
<i>”Men’s higher drive for status”</i>
<i>”We always ask why we don’t see women in top leadership positions, but we never ask why we see so many men in these jobs. These positions often require long, stressful hours that may not be worth it if you want a balanced and fulfilling life.”</i>
<i>”Status is the primary metric that men are judged on, pushing many men into these higher paying, less satisfying jobs for the status that they entail. Note, the same forces that lead men into high pay/high stress jobs in tech and leadership cause men to take undesirable and dangerous jobs like coal mining, garbage collection, and firefighting, and suffer 93% of work-related deaths.”</i>
<i>”Non-discriminatory ways to reduce the gender gap”</i>
<i>”Below I’ll go over some of the differences in distribution of traits between men and women that I outlined in the previous section and suggest ways to address them to increase women’s representation in tech and without resorting to discrimination. Google is already making strides in many of these areas, but I think it’s still instructive to list them:”</i>
<i>”Women on average show a higher interest in people and men in things”</i>
<i>”We can make software engineering more people-oriented with pair programming and more collaboration. Unfortunately, there may be limits to how people-oriented certain roles and Google can be and we shouldn’t deceive ourselves or students into thinking otherwise (some of our programs to get female students into coding might be doing this).”</i>
<i>”Women on average are more cooperative
Allow those exhibiting cooperative behavior to thrive. Recent updates to Perf may be doing this to an extent, but maybe there’s more we can do. This doesn’t mean that we should remove all competitiveness from Google. Competitiveness and self reliance can be valuable traits and we shouldn’t necessarily disadvantage those that have them, like what’s been done in education. Women on average are more prone to anxiety. Make tech and leadership less stressful. Google already partly does this with its many stress reduction courses and benefits.”</i>
<i>”Women on average look for more work-life balance while men have a higher drive for status on average.”</i>
<i>”Unfortunately, as long as tech and leadership remain high status, lucrative careers, men may disproportionately want to be in them. Allowing and truly endorsing (as part of our culture) part time work though can keep more women in tech.”</i>
<i>”The male gender role is currently inflexible
Feminism has made great progress in freeing women from the female gender role, but men are still very much tied to the male gender role. If we, as a society, allow men to be more “feminine,” than the gender gap will shrink, although probably because men will leave tech and leadership for traditionally feminine roles.”</i>
<i>”Philosophically, I don’t think we should do arbitrary social engineering of tech just to make it appealing to equal portions of both men and women. For each of these changes, we need principles reasons for why it helps Google; that is, we should be optimizing for Google—with Google’s diversity being a component of that. For example currently those trying to work extra hours or take extra stress will inevitably get ahead and if we try to change that too much, it may have disastrous consequences. Also, when considering the costs and benefits, we should keep in mind that Google’s funding is finite so its allocation is more zero-sum than is generally acknowledged.”</i>
<i>”The Harm of Google’s biases”</i>
<i>”I strongly believe in gender and racial diversity, and I think we should strive for more. However, to achieve a more equal gender and race representation, Google has created several discriminatory practices:”</i>
<i>”Programs, mentoring, and classes only for people with a certain gender or race 
A high priority queue and special treatment for “diversity” candidates. ”</i>
<i>”Hiring practices which can effectively lower the bar for “diversity” candidates by decreasing the false negative rate
Reconsidering any set of people if it’s not “diverse” enough, but not showing that same scrutiny in the reverse direction (clear confirmation bias)”</i>
<i>”Setting org level OKRs for increased representation which can incentivize illegal discrimination ”</i>
<i>”These practices are based on false assumptions generated by our biases and can actually increase race and gender tensions. We’re told by senior leadership that what we’re doing is both the morally and economically correct thing to do, but without evidence this is just veiled left ideology that can irreparably harm Google.”</i>
<i>”Why we’re blind”</i>
<i>”We all have biases and use motivated reasoning to dismiss ideas that run counter to our internal values. Just as some on the Right deny science that runs counter to the “God > humans > environment” hierarchy (e.g., evolution and climate change) the Left tends to deny science concerning biological differences between people (e.g., IQ and sex differences). Thankfully, climate scientists and evolutionary biologists generally aren’t on the right. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of humanities and social scientists learn left (about 95%), which creates enormous confirmation bias, changes what’s being studied, and maintains myths like social constructionism and the gender wage gap. Google’s left leaning makes us blind to this bias and uncritical of its results, which we’re using to justify highly politicized programs.”</i>
<i>”In addition to the Left’s affinity for those it sees as weak, humans are generally biased towards protecting females. As mentioned before, this likely evolved because males are biologically disposable and because women are generally more cooperative and areeable than men. We have extensive government and Google programs, fields of study, and legal and social norms to protect women, but when a man complains about a gender issue issue [sic] affecting men, he’s labelled as a misogynist and whiner. Nearly every difference between men and women is interpreted as a form of women’s oppression.”</i>
<i>”As with many things in life, gender differences are often a case of “grass being greener on the other side”; unfortunately, taxpayer and Google money is spent to water only one side of the lawn.”</i>
<i>”The same compassion for those seen as weak creates political correctness, which constrains discourse and is complacent to the extremely sensitive PC-authoritarians that use violence and shaming to advance their cause. While Google hasn’t harbored the violent leftists protests that we’re seeing at universities, the frequent shaming in TGIF and in our culture has created the same silence, psychologically unsafe environment.”</i>
<i>”I hope it’s clear that I’m not saying that diversity is bad, that Google or society is 100% fair, that we shouldn’t try to correct for existing biases, or that minorities have the same experience of those in the majority. My larger point is that we have an intolerance for ideas and evidence that don’t fit a certain ideology. I’m also not saying that we should restrict people to certain gender roles; I’m advocating for quite the opposite: treat people as individuals, not as just another member of their group (tribalism).”</i>
<i>”My concrete suggestions are to:
<i>”As soon as we start to moralize an issue, we stop thinking about it in terms of costs and benefits, dismiss anyone that disagrees as immoral, and harshly punish those we see as villains to protect the “victims.”</i>
<i>”Stop alienating conservatives.”</i>
<i>”Viewpoint diversity is arguably the most important type of diversity and political orientation is one of the most fundamental and significant ways in which people view things differently.”</i>
<i>”In highly progressive environments, conservatives are a minority that feel like they need to stay in the closet to avoid open hostility. We should empower those with different ideologies to be able to express themselves.”</i>
<i>”Alienating conservatives is both non-inclusive and generally bad business because conservatives tend to be higher in conscientiousness, which is require for much of the drudgery and maintenance work characteristic of a mature company.”</i>
<i>”Confront Google’s biases.”</i>
<i>”I’ve mostly concentrated on how our biases cloud our thinking about diversity and inclusion, but our moral biases are farther reaching than that.”</i>
<i>”I would start by breaking down Googlegeist scores by political orientation and personality to give a fuller picture into how our biases are affecting our culture.”</i>
<i>”Stop restricting programs and classes to certain genders or races.”</i>
<i>”These discriminatory practices are both unfair and divisive. Instead focus on some of the non-discriminatory practices I outlined.
Have an open and honest discussion about the costs and benefits of our diversity programs.”</i>
<i>”Discriminating just to increase the representation of women in tech is as misguided and biased as mandating increases for women’s representation in the homeless, work-related and violent deaths, prisons, and school dropouts.”</i>
<i>”There’s currently very little transparency into the extend of our diversity programs which keeps it immune to criticism from those outside its ideological echo chamber.
These programs are highly politicized which further alienates non-progressives.”</i>
<i>”I realize that some of our programs may be precautions against government accusations of discrimination, but that can easily backfire since they incentivize illegal discrimination.”</i>
<i>”Focus on psychological safety, not just race/gender diversity.”</i>
<i>”We should focus on psychological safety, which has shown positive effects and should (hopefully) not lead to unfair discrimination.
We need psychological safety and shared values to gain the benefits of diversity
Having representative viewpoints is important for those designing and testing our products, but the benefits are less clear for those more removed from UX.”</i>
<i>”I’ve heard several calls for increased empathy on diversity issues. While I strongly support trying to understand how and why people think the way they do, relying on affective empathy—feeling another’s pain—causes us to focus on anecdotes, favor individuals similar to us, and harbor other irrational and dangerous biases. Being emotionally unengaged helps us better reason about the facts.”</i>
<i>”Our focus on microaggressions and other unintentional transgressions increases our sensitivity, which is not universally positive: sensitivity increases both our tendency to take offense and our self censorship, leading to authoritarian policies. Speaking up without the fear of being harshly judged is central to psychological safety, but these practices can remove that safety by judging unintentional transgressions.”</i>
<i>”Microaggression training incorrectly and dangerously equates speech with violence and isn’t backed by evidence.”</i>
<i>”Be open about the science of human nature.”</i>
<i>”Once we acknowledge that not all differences are socially constructed or due to discrimination, we open our eyes to a more accurate view of the human condition which is necessary if we actually want to solve problems.”</i>
<i>”Reconsider making Unconscious Bias training mandatory for promo committees.”</i>
<i>”We haven’t been able to measure any effect of our Unconscious Bias training and it has the potential for overcorrecting or backlash, especially if made mandatory.”</i>
<i>”Some of the suggested methods of the current training (v2.3) are likely useful, but the political bias of the presentation is clear from the factual inaccuracies and the examples shown.”</i>
<i>”Spend more time on the many other types of biases besides stereotypes. Stereotypes are much more accurate and responsive to new information than the training suggests (I’m not advocating for using stereotypes, I [sic] just pointing out the factual inaccuracy of what’s said in the training).”</i>
<i>” This document is mostly written from the perspective of Google’s Mountain View campus, I can’t speak about other offices or countries.”</i>
<i>” Of course, I may be biased and only see evidence that supports my viewpoint. In terms of political biases, I consider myself a classical liberal and strongly value individualism and reason. I’d be very happy to discuss any of the document further and provide more citations.”</i>
<i>” Throughout the document, by “tech”, I mostly mean software engineering.”</i>
<i>” For heterosexual romantic relationships, men are more strongly judged by status and women by beauty. Again, this has biological origins and is culturally universal.”</i>
<i>” Stretch, BOLD, CSSI, Engineering Practicum (to an extent), and several other Google funded internal and external programs are for people with a certain gender or race.”</i>
<i>” Instead set Googlegeist OKRs, potentially for certain demographics. We can increase representation at an org level by either making it a better environment for certain groups (which would be seen in survey scores) or discriminating based on a protected status (which is illegal and I’ve seen it done). Increased representation OKRs can incentivize the latter and create zero-sum struggles between orgs.”</i>
<i>” Communism promised to be both morally and economically superior to capitalism, but every attempt became morally corrupt and an economic failure. As it became clear that the working class of the liberal democracies wasn’t going to overthrow their “capitalist oppressors,” the Marxist intellectuals transitioned from class warfare to gender and race politics. The core oppressor-oppressed dynamics remained, but now the oppressor is the “white, straight, cis-gendered patriarchy.””</i>
<i>” Ironically, IQ tests were initially championed by the Left when meritocracy meant helping the victims of the aristocracy.”</i>
<i>” Yes, in a national aggregate, women have lower salaries than men for a variety of reasons. For the same work though, women get paid just as much as men. Considering women spend more money than men and that salary represents how much the employees sacrifices (e.g. more hours, stress, and danger), we really need to rethink our stereotypes around power.”</i>
<i>” “The traditionalist system of gender does not deal well with the idea of men needing support. Men are expected to be strong, to not complain, and to deal with problems on their own. Men’s problems are more often seen as personal failings rather than victimhood,, due to our gendered idea of agency. This discourages men from bringing attention to their issues (whether individual or group-wide issues), for fear of being seen as whiners, complainers, or weak.””</i>
<i>” Political correctness is defined as “the avoidance of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against,” which makes it clear why it’s a phenomenon of the Left and a tool of authoritarians.”</i>
He's probably tired of having to do his own work and the work of flat out imbeciles who only got hired because diversity whining bastards wouldn't shut up until someone who's incompetent and brown got hired.
Lol, jealousy, racism and fear of females in just 2 comments.
The reason most get ahead is they are better
If you're so frightened of the color brown, stay out of the sun
Women aren't that scary dude, but in your case your hand is probably safest
You can actually see the bitterness and inferiority in your statements, poor babies.
Right, "racism and sexism", it couldn't be, it's absolutely impossible, that its not racism its me being tired of having to literally do or do over 100% of the work done by brown imbeciles and female dimwits who only got hired because of diversity directives?
We're talking people for whom there is absolutely no chance any software firm would hire them without diversity rules being in play.
I'm sure you can imagine what it would be like if you worked with someone for whom you had to simply do the work yourself, or, do it all over again from start, EVERY, SINGLE, TIME.
You didn't like it, did you?
Alternatively you're one of those disphits who just flat out despise whitey, so you're fine with whitey getting replaced by hopelessly incompetent browns and females.
I'm white myself and I don't give a fuck about your color, gender, religion, etc. As for diversity, if someone is unfairly hired sure it's wrong. What gets up my nose though is cthe pathetic whining of sad little cunts who are shit at their job and can't hack that some woman, or 'brown' as you put it, or someone with a different faith is better than YOU! If someones picked unfaily, that's not their fault, that's the fault of those too stupid to correctly apply the rules, as regards the way you lot would do it. You would have a fucking heart attack if some black, muslim woman with a 140 I.Q applied for a job, you'd still give it to some braindead white christian jock, and there's the problem, some assholes missapply the rules through stupidity or fear, then on the otherside there's 'you'. A sad little bitch who'd bring back slavery, reinstitute the inquisition and chain his wife to the sink and his daughter to the bed. As regards having to redo work of others? Yes ,done it, yes, annoyed and it's been by 'all' colour, religion and sex so stop exagerating. Your problem is 'you' can't do 'your' job and are probably made to redo 'your' work until 'you' get it right and the fact is you're scared of blacks and women and people with intellect, because 'you' think that everyone should think like 'you', and that you fucking quarter wit is how extremist/terrorist assholes get started. So basically that you dumb little cunt makes 'you' no better than the whackjobs in ISIS or Al-Qaeda you freak cunt, now fuck off and get educated, ya hick.
So you do hate white people then.
Arrogant brown shithead detected, or self hating white guilt suicide cultist.
Please end your white guilt and kill yourself. Or hey, let the blacks and browns do it for you, or did you forget that they absolutely HATE you?
Don't bother with anecdotes and outliers, you know what I say is true.
And there you have, positive proof that 6157 can't read and that they're an internet coward, fuck you, you yellow bellied nazi cum licker. You're so frightened of color i'm amazed you don't shoot your family if they get a suntan. You're logic is non existant, your claims are ridiculous, you talk about anecdotes, etc, which incidentaly how you tried to use your 'logic' against me, yet you cry like a little bitch when it's returned. What you 'know' is true is that you're an ill educated thug justifying your failures in life by blaming everyone else because you're too weak to admit you're a failure. Unfortunately no doubt you'll continue to disrupt the genetics of this world by producing more offspring, one can only hope that you're not doing so with the female members of your own family, it's doubly unfortunate though because no matter who it's with you'll no doubt brainwash them with your delusional gibberings as you continue to justify how useless you are.
Just to clarify, I'm white(as already mentioned initially, dumbfuck)
I do hate… gutless facist cowards who blame people based on color.
I have no guilt as I would happily cut your throat and smile as you died(P.S. I'm christian)
I have many friends of a number of hues, religions and sex/uality who know 'exactly' how I stand, and yet are unconcerned.
As regards anecdotes; did you hear the one about..
the nazi who went to russia, no? neither did his family
or the IRA member who was taught to throw grenades but threw the pin instead? it was a real blast
maybe the guy who told everyone vhe was a hard ass, then they found out you liked being a cock sleeve,
you know what I say is true.
So how much is BAMN paying you to shill on the internet?
Or is it David Brock?
You sound mad as fuck and dangerously violent, too, by the way.
You do know that "punch a Nazi" shit is grounds for you to get your head blown off because you punched the wrong "Nazi" right?
Oh and thanks for confirming you're a self hating ((("""white"""))) person, moishe heebsteinberg.
Whatever dickhead, as usual if someone doesn't agree they're a shill or some other sad shit, after all having a 'real' answer is hard work. your nonsense has also proved you either can't read properly or just don't understand. In regards to mad as fuck I'm not the sad shit who needs a gun to replace what's missing below, and frankly all 'nazi's' are wrong and cowards. Let's face it, how hard is it to point guns at unarmed men, women and kids. Finally, as regards self-hating, nope, still wrong, I'm proud as fuck of my lineage both on my mother and fathers side, unlike you
Lets review you're crybaby list;
All jews, muslims, etc.. evil
Anyone with coloured skin hate us
All women are stupider and weaker than men
Jesus you're an embarrassement to white people, you're so scared, bigoted, racist, sexist and paranoid you probably shit your pants when the mail arrives, unless you're rich god only knows how you go to work or get groceries, you are pathetic. I was thinking about carrying on, but honestly all I see from future ravings from you is sad variants on the shill theme, the sad 'threat' theme, the you hate whites/yourself theme, etc. TBH you're an ill educated sad little boor, so I'll have another quick look round, then I'm off to wind up some 'leftist' wankers instead, by the way, you might want to consider joining a militia, I hear they need someone for latrine duty :)
So you're saying things like the USS Liberty incident, the King David Hotel Affair, the Deir Yassein massacre, and the extra-judicial kidnapping and trial of Mordechai Vanunu didn't happen?
Is that what you're saying?
Jesus, I take one quick skim through here and you're still cackling on, to answer your question, of course I'm not vsaying that you idiot. What I am saying is to take things in context, example the kidnapping shit, lets ignore the hundsreds of other kidnappings for a minute, what about extraordinary rendition, quasilegal kidnapping at best, here's a link to wiki for a simple talk on it;
massacres, really? you want to talk racial violence, ok lets go; US;
religion, fine UK;
Right wing nutters, sure;
How about domestic, no problem;
And idiot, I'm not even trying, I haven't included everywhack job on the left or right, or all the countries in europe let alone anywhere else, i havrn't included the religious psychos from christianity, islam, hindu, buddhism, etc, i've not even attempted to include the animal, abortion, vegan, diy freaks
I could literally fill a thousand books with who,what,where,why,when,how and i still wouldn't finish, but after all that, i still get stupid little cunts like you picking out the ones 'you' like and ignoring ALL the fucking rest, why? Because you. are. weak. Goodbye.
This blame whitey for everything shit is what makes everyone think you hate whitey.
You want to talk about racial violence? Lets talk about the black on white murder rape and mayhem that goes on daily, that is going on right this very second, and that you are completely ignoring because it suits your hate whitey agenda.
Women and children get raped and murdered for absolutely no sane reason daily hourly minutely by blacks yet you still defend blacks no matter what.
That is why you are weak, and why I guarantee you that you won't do shit when nignogs kick your doors in and start rape murdering your family because they live in the "wrong" neighborhood, or lets face it, "you a damn cracker and fuck you white devil".
When and if it gets south Africa tier and whites are getting murdered wholesale broad daylight, then and only then will you see the error of your ways.
Shorty Belton, Chris and Channon Newsome, John Paul Foster, the MARTA mass robbery? All blacks killing and aping out for stupid or nonexistent reasons that a 2nd grader could see through.
Also you didn't discuss the daily absolutely savage rape murder and mayhem that blacks and browns put on Europeans when they systematically target white women and children for rape and murder.
You'll no doubt dredge up some bullshit from over 100 years ago in a desperate attempt to say whitey deserves it, and that again is why everyone thinks you hate whitey.
You want to talk real talk? Lets talk real talk about it; a solid 98 percent of third worlders can't fit in civilized society and forcing them to try results in them getting into a resentment spiral and definitely, certainly, always leads to them acting out.
6176, you just proved my point, at no time have I 'ever' said that there is not an issue re black on white, what I have said is this whole shit about being selective.
As for weak, believe what you want, I know what I have done and to who I've done it, but again your own statement proves my point about your mindset 'nignogs' wow yeah you're not racist honest, as for africa and whites murdered wholesale exageration again, it's mainly tribal or crap like blood diamonds, it doesn't help when you've got commies and fucking mercenaries, etc. That list is insane, but apartheid wasn't exactly innocent and in many ways caused half the shit. Shorty Belton, etc, yeah horrible but the fact is brits,americans, germans, french, etc have done shit too and for crap like being looked at funny, or being simply black, or having a suspicious accent. The daily rape murder shit is just that, shit, every single color is just as guilty, your problem is half the time you only get 'selected' news from shites like this, so you get spoonfed your daily hatred along with your twisted stats. In regard to 3rd worlders fitting in, how can they? most of the time there's some stupid dick like you constantly watching, making assumptions, accusing no matter what. I wonder how long 'you' would last if some halfwit like you was constantly watching, judging, twisting the facts. Face it, you are a racist and you will do everything you can to 'ensure' that you don't have to live with 'niggers' or 'muslims', just face up to your own hatred and intolerance, I'd say, be a man, but you probably already think you are.
I chose not to live among third world apes and their monkeyfuckery ages and aeons ago you dumbass.
You're the dumbass that wants to flood every civilized country in the world with them.
Oh, thou chose, aeons ago no less, yet I be the dimmed candle. Most interesting, and how pray may thee tell wast thou able to bring into being such a wondrous event. One must assuredly be most able explain thy longevity to us mere mortals for 'tis obvious that such a one as thee must be blessed with great fortune to have avoided the accursed reaper, woulds't thou endeavour to illuminate us with thy wisdom, or perchance dost thou instead be the 'dumbed ass' of whom one perceives in others.
Apologies, my syntax is rusty.
No, you negroid nincompoop, your syntax isn't "rusty", its just terrible.
I would attribute my longevity to not relaxing around blacks.
Blacks? Jews? Terrible news!
The jew cries out in pain as he stabs you in the back. - polish proverb, 11th century.
No, actually it's sarcastic in reality, although i'm unsurprised by your racism. Let's face it, you will always find little proverbs, etc from and about and regarding all cultures,k so big surprise that you find a proverb to fit in with your world view, just vlike your desperate and childish need to assume my 'colour' or 'guilt' because of course 'you must' be right and everyone else wrong. The logic of a child, 'if i believe i'm right, then i must be'. As for your longevity? being a 12 year old(at least mentally) only means mommy and daddy have taken care of you, even with your paranoid delesions(P.S, there's no monsters under your bed), night, night, sleep tight…. oh, and try not to wet the bed :)
Anonymous No. 6269 8/9/2017 9:45:26
We should not let 6269 out of the womb let alone near a computer.
6301, and we should listen to a shill that can't link properly;
We can't seem to find the page you're looking for.
lmfao, hur, hur, durrrrrr.