By Red Pill  |  06-18-2017   News
Photo credit: Redpill | thegoldwater

Tariq Nasheed calls himself an Anti-Racist Strategist. However, he's a provocateur of promoting Anti-White rhetoric day in and day out.

Every time a terror attack happens, anytime a black man is charged with a crime, Tariq finds some way to blame it on what he calls the “oppressive racism of Whites” instead of being accountable for the actions of his own people.

Tariq just today tried to vilify rape victims of Bill Cosby, by stating that Gloria Allred, the attorney for an African American rape victim, somehow used the woman to “Blacken-It Up” so the trial wouldn't appear to be racist.

Tariq is disgusting, and will never hold accountability for crimes committed by other blacks. Bill Cosby actually raped women, admitting himself he would drug them beforehand and later use their intoxication to take advantage of them sexually.

How do you even defend that? Tariq thinks it's somehow related to Cosby’s skin color. Very disturbing to say the least.

A white man questioned him and said “If there are so many murderous white supremacists then why is Tariq Nasheed remaining unmurdered” to which Tariq used the tweet to somehow insinuate the man was a white supremacist sending him a death threat. Absolutely absurd.

It's not just Whites who call out Tariq on his obviously racist and anti-white antics, even ethnic minorities have attacked his clearly bigoted remarks.

A Sikh YouTube commentator Annand Virk, popularly known as Bunty King on social media, was banned on Twitter following a race-related argument with “anti-racism strategist” and failed rap artist Tariq Nasheed.

After a complex chain of argumentative replies between the two, Virk brought up the racism involved with Nasheed’s daily Anti-White tweets on race and white supremacy to which the ever unintelligent Nasheed and professional sleaze responded by calling Virk a “Hapa” in a reply.

For those who are unaware, this is the equivalent of using the word “nigger” to a Sikh and often used to refer to them with a bigoted attack. Nasheed uses the slur in reference to all non-white people who, in his estimation, perpetuate white supremacy by disagreeing with him.

So who is Tariq Nasheed? A man who spends his day on Twitter railing against white supremacy and hidden white supremacist symbols.

He’s famous for such tweets like “the Cleveland Facebook killer may be used as an excuse for white supremacists to go around shooting black people.” He has also on Tucker Carlson’s show to crucify the police for shooting the OSU terrorist last year.

Inciting such hatred and division is common for Black Supremacist pundits such as Tariq who would rather see us divided versus uniting against a common enemy.

Over Philando Castille, Tariq tweeted “Black people, while we out here bull***ting around, white supremacist training, and coming up with ways to KILL you 247” which prompted Twitter user and white rights advocate @BasedMonitored to reply “Tariq Nasheed is a problem. People actually listen to his drivel.”

Based Monitored is correct. People do listen to these Anti-White rhetoric and mistake it for the fact. Since we're discussing facts, however, let's point out a few of them.

First off, the officer who shot Philando Castille was Hispanic Officer Jeronimo Yanez who's clearly not white nor a White Supremacist.

Next, Havard Studies have shown there is no racial bias on shootings by police officers. The paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research, which examined thousands of incidents at 10 large police departments in California, Florida, and Texas, concluded that police were no more likely to shoot non-whites than whites after factoring in extenuating circumstances.

Harvard economics professor Roland G. Fryer Jr. said, “On the most extreme use of force officer-involved shootings we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account.” Mr. Fryer, who is black, told The New York Times that the finding of no racial discrimination in police shootings was “the most surprising result of my career.”

In fact, the entire “Hands Up, Don't Shoot” motto is founded on a lie. Through exhaustive interviews with witnesses, including going as far as to cross-checking their statements with previous statements to authorities and the media, ballistics, DNA evidence and results from three autopsies, the Justice Department was able to present a credible and troubling picture of what happened to Michael Brown.

The Justice Department, and a reminder this was under President Obama, found that Officer Wilson knew about the theft of the cigarillos from the convenience store and had a description of the suspects. Michael Brown proceeded to have fought with the officer and tried to take his gun. And the popular hands-up storyline, which isn’t corroborated by ballistic and DNA evidence and multiple witness statements, was perpetuated by an unknown Witness 101.

In fact, the entire media and Witness 101, whom we all know as Dorian Johnson, the friend with who was with Brown that day, was not supported by the evidence and other witness statements. The entire concept is a lie. Michael Brown was a thug and he tried to take the officer's gun.

Once again the narrative being pushed by Anti-White Black Supremacists such as Tariq Nasheed is completely without merit.

If you wanted to get even more technical, Adjusted for the homicide rate, whites are 1.7 times more likely than blacks die at the hands of police. Adjusted for the racial disparity at which police are feloniously killed, whites are 1.3 times more likely than blacks to die at the hands of police. Tariq and these Anti-White bigots simply cannot comprehend the truth or they choose to ignore it completely.

The Journal of Experimental Criminology found that officers took longer to pull the trigger on black men than on white or Hispanic men. So that argument is completely invalid.

To further benefit those claims, Whites are actually fifty percent more likely to be killed by police officers than blacks. 50 percent of the victims of fatal police shootings were white, while 26 percent were black.

Heather Mac Donald in a speech at Hillsdale College said: “Such a concentration of criminal violence in minority communities means that officers will be disproportionately confronting armed and often resisting suspects in those communities, raising officers’ own risk of using lethal force.”

To summarize the criminal activities of those who are black far surpass that of those who are white.

President Trump on the campaign trail actually echoed these facts saying that has effectively declaring that blacks were responsible for 81 percent of the killings of white Americans, that "African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape they've ever been in before," and that "inner-city crime is reaching record levels."

The statistics show that the 500 killings of white people attributed to blacks last year were the most since black perpetrators were determined to be responsible for the homicides of 504 white people nationwide in 2008. Last year's total was up 12 percent from the 446 recorded in 2014 and 22 percent from the 409 seen in 2013, a year that saw the lowest total this century and one that capped seven years of general declines in black-on-white homicides. Prior to that, 2006 saw the most black-on-white killings since 2001, with 573.

So it certainly seems that Black Supremacists such as Tariq Nasheed undoubtedly have their facts wrong and quite possibly are encouraging the further killing of innocent Whites in America.

Tariq, delete your account.

Share this article


On The Goldwater you can comment anonymously, meaning you can post freely without being tracked or monitored. Your Identity is hidden from others.
3 Comment/s


Anonymous No. 3893 1497759749

DAAAMN!

DAT NIGGRA TOLD YOU, TARIQ!

WORLD STAR! WORLD STAR!

Anonymous No. 3896 1497762009

tfw le race card will not save you forever

Nonrasist purplesupremest No. 3928 1497846279

Chartreuse Supremest rule all red, black and white people are the lowest form of humans. We Chartreuse people are the only pure bloods.

What do you think about this article?
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File