By Lexy  |  10-05-2018   News
Photo credit: @nymag | Twitter

Christine Ford’s horrible accusations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh have shed light on just how far the Democrats will go to get what they want, or in this case, what they don’t want.

Ford’s accusations have been in question by the Republicans since she has provided no date, no location and all of the alleged witnesses, including her close friend, denied the allegations.

I recently read a thread on Twitter that I found very interesting. It reminded me of that phrase “wag the dog”.

“The phrase 'Wag the Dog' is used to indicate that attention is purposely being diverted from something of greater importance to something of lesser importance”.

Please read the thread below. It sheds some light on a lot of inconsistencies that Ford has tried to cover up.

Beginning of thread, by Margot Cleveland:

Let me ask you something. If a woman came forward and said that she was sexually assaulted in the summer of 1982 when she was 15 by one boy, with a second in the room egging it on, and to corroborate her claim she pointed to small portions of notes from a therapist which said that she described a "rape attempt" in her late teens that involved 4 boys and in her first text describing the attempted rape, the women said it happened in the mid-80s, what would you think?

That the notes did not corroborate her account.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/5d22dfc779112bfc840a1822e628d059b809506466d7806e90aa457bfa3db802.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

But Ford has tricked everyone into ignoring the differences in dates (82 is not mid-80s) and age (15 is not late-teens) and to assume that Ford was telling her therapist about the supposed Kavanaugh attempt.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/5c904e0383d57c5cd679d4b9cf3da559ad0dae26fcbe390de1eb33ee1fe552fa.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

But in her handwritten note before the polygraph she crossed out "early" before the 80s. Why?

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/8be6a2024f5331667d6ffbcef7cc6d4de936bcc588ee62aa5e609a2ad4b790d9.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

Well Ford testified she later figured out that it was summer of 1982 because she knew she wasn't driving at the time and always drove once she got her license.

(But how since she doesn't know how she got home?)

But why would she go into detail with the therapist and convey late-teens?

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/1c77fb168f2e72a686297a472480e561dbe826be4663bba60b3d438169ccd37c.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

And two things bothered me about Ford's testimony (well more than two but two things the connect up to this point).

Ford Dwelled on the Safeway connection and Mark Ford. So much so that she raised it in a portion that made no sense and was forced.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/8943f17d5f1776f86a2dbe74d42c52f043f9e2d95afc0d88f8eca56c6ec7e166.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

She was asked if her note to Feinstein was accurate and corrected two things and then said oh, but look, I ran into Mark Judge at Safeway about 6 - 8 weeks after the attack and you can look at when he worked there to narrow down the date of the attack.

Now that made no sense to me. How would that narrow it down. She knew (supposedly) it was in the summer of 82 and Mark Judge would have presumably worked at the store for some time so how would you know which day she ran into him. And then 6 - 8 weeks back? Come on, that doesn't help at all.

Since, without an actual date no one can figure anything out any better than early summer which is what she had seemed to say. And then she bothered to tell that whole story about going in a separate door than her mom. Why? So mom couldn't confirm.

And she mentioned Safeway not once as a way to figure out the date but five times! And two Dems picked up on her point too. Why? Not too narrow the time frame down–wouldn't really do that. But to seem to corroborate her testimony that the attack happened in 1982 when she was 15, by one boy and one bystander

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/b9df4b57a892b1f6e26a3cc64f51b510a8508e604683162c5a480c23c1ce45b1.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/1528bec85be7132c057f15e19b6eae008ff185cc73ebc09a2c0339d9d6f1b9ce.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/81e8853227e27cfd6778d4fcb371d20a5bd2c7a14058f7fde379dbcecd3cc45d.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

And not in the mid-80s when she was in her late teens by four boys as the actual therapist's records say! And how would Ford know that tying Mark Judge to working at the grocery store would set time in summer of 1982?

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/a13250616f71024770ed4a1108e9ff04bdf36a08bce19cda3f5e70e707b0577a.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/b14f59cffd007e1e8d312b09c5740baf81eeec6bbd271cc7b52b7e66ef10528a.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

His book said so! So now everyone is focused on Safeway and when Mark Judge worked there. And when it comes back three weeks in July or August of 1982, everyone will be walking 6-8 weeks backwards from there and ignoring conflict in therapist's records. Don't believe me?

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/f19e985d5fc45544bfd39d129c05df581a040852ce23d4212534b20cca9a1dcb.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/25533c4504ce85bbe895d4c44cb6f27ee79d7bca290bdcd9ea47a561ac4eabd0.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

Look how Ford's Safeway testimony has been reported: <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/2018/09/27/mark-judges-book-validates-christine-fords-timeline-alleged-kavanaugh-assault/"> Judge's book validates Ford's timeline! </a>.

But Ford's attorneys refused to turn over therapist's records which record what Ford told therapist and that was, attack in the mid-80s when in her late teens and four boys!

And that timeline makes more sense with what Ford said in her testimony: That the worst part was the first four years after the attack. And what did she mention then? Her time at college! Not her junior and senior years in high school!! Which brings me to the second point that connects up and that bothered me.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/ad1225c74c9efb99dcfd7b48e3995085de048b8278244a4be8b7885d84a3363a.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

Ford had gone to her therapist's office to get copies of her records, before contacting the Washington Post, to see if what she said was recorded in there. But Ford said she was only concerned re Kavanaugh in early July and texted Washington Post on July 6 when she physically had copies of her records after going to the office to get. Why? To see what the records said! But what else is in the records, we don't know. What we do know that is in there is much different than her current claim.

Records say late teen 16/ by four boys. Ford says 15 by one boy and one bystander.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/1311e9aa036625fc7588337dec7ca8a66260c588e0126de993a097c1bdcdc894.jpeg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland"> Margot Cleveland Twitter </a></span

Apparently, that's close enough for government work, when you're a Democrat! But no one is really focusing on this disparate but instead asking if Safeway had one or two doors in 1982! (It had 2-I've confirmed w/ sources).

Ford's been Gaslighting America! "Oh, look Safeway, Mark Judge worked there in 1982 and that was 6 - 8 weeks after Kavanaugh attempted to rape me…" And the hounds are chasing the red herring and accepting as fact that attack she spoke of in therapy occurred in 1982 even though the therapist's notes do not support her claim. FBI needs to find out when Ford picked up docs at therapists and then GET. THE. DAMN. THERAPIST'S. RECORDS.

End Thread

Actual thread below:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">THREAD: Let me ask you something. If a woman came forward and said that she was sexually assaulted in the summer of 1982 when she was 15 by one boy, with a second in the room egging her on, and to corroborate her claim she pointed to small portions of notes from a therapist 1/</p>&mdash; Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1046219137285070848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 30, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Prior to the Kavanaugh hearings, I knew how divided the country had become but now I worry that there is absolutely no way to turn it around.

<b>By: Lexy </b>

<b><i>On Twitter? Follow me:</i></b>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/PoliticallyRYT">@PoliticallyRYT</a>

<strong><span style="color:red;">Have Information? Message me!</span></strong>

Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
7 Comment/s


Cody No. 38700 1538734202

Great breakdown and article Lexy.

Bruce No. 38702 1538738148

Ford is a plant being used by Dems and her activist lawyers.

DA No. 38714 1538743488

There is ONE way! Jesus!

This is the part that has stuck w/me. Why do we obtain our own therapist records, BEFORE they are necessary or asked for?… Bc "we" are preparing for something… That's why. Who carries around their therapy records🤷🏼‍♀️ Why would ANYONE want those in PRINT where others might access them? It's just D U M B! She was preparing for this fight👇

Anonymous No. 38740 1538754342

How did this silly woman get a house in Palo Alto? And what kind of man would marry an old dog with that kind of wear and tear? Her friends told on her for being drunk and promiscuous in high school (64 plus…. Talk about stretched!). And like most Psych majors she is obsessed with her own abnormalities.

The little kid's voice? How weird is that? I can imagine her being turned out at a young age; with that sexual record she had to be, it was the 60s/70s so there was likely drugs and rich parents that were loathe to call the authorities. Unattractive girl trying to make up for that face and pelican gullet by being easy with a capital E. Add the likelihood of STDs and abortions and we can only imagine the state of her innards. She does look like 10 miles of bad road..

We used to call girls like that Daddy's Little Ho's. Pops or someone close had to hit is, since no one was that easy otherwise. Unlike the poor girls they weren't going to the police or talking about it, since the end result would be moving in with the apartment dwellers; can't have that. This phenom is common in Hollywood, Natalie Wood and Sandra Dee come to mind, but anyone from well off areas either knows or has suspicions. Therefore I'd imagine that this 'Doctor' is connected enough to the K case to be of value, has such a lack of self esteem and ethics as to go through with a character assasination and is greedy enough to take the shekels offered (see the GoFundMe campaign). That she is a narcissist goes without saying. And if she was actually under oath in a court room it might be of interest to find out just who and when her initial sexual contacts with with. Put those questions on the polygraph. That would shut her up

Jo No. 38742 1538754984

The DemocRats should ask for a refund. Their Actress can’t seem to get her lies, I mean lines straight.

Droopy Dog `s pitch for a new show. No. 38744 1538755460

"Hong Kong Phooey! Where is Mighty Mouse? How about, Speedy Gonzales? Plenty of Swiss cheese here! I brought wine for the Mrs. you grab some crackers, this is going to be good!"

Those lies are as full of holes as her soul.

Oh my! I`m starting to see a pattern with the left… ;-)

Mona No. 38695 1538775017
Her testimony indicated no introspection of herself but rather skills and manipulative behavior of a skilled technician familiar with psychology-family history of political activism brought me to conclusion that she’s an activist
What do you think about this article?
Name
Comment *
Image