A California judge ruled that Twitter’s policy of banning users “at any time, for any reason or for no reason” may constitute an “unconscionable contract”. The judge ruled that a lawsuit against the company brought by Jared Taylor, self-described “white advocate”, may proceed on that basis.
Twitter’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit from Taylor, who was banned by the platform in December last year, was rejected by the judge.
Twitter’s argument was that it has a first amendment right to ban whoever it likes from its platform, for whatever reason. That argument was rejected by the judge, ruling that Twitter’s policy of suspending accounts, in the judge’s words, “at any time, for any reason or for no reason” may be unconscionable and that the company calling itself a platform devoted to free speech may be misleading and therefore fraudulent.
“~ Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Admits That Twitter Has a “Left-Leaning” Bias. ~”
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">~ Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Admits That Twitter Has a “Left Leaning” Bias. ~ <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FirstAmendment?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FirstAmendment</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cody45?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cody45</a>🐯<a href="https://t.co/BbuPk48PUq">pic.twitter.com/BbuPk48PUq</a></p>— Cody (@buzzman888) <a href="https://twitter.com/buzzman888/status/1031142470653014016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 19, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
“This ruling has massive implications for the platform going forward,” said Noah Peters, Jared Taylor’s lawyer. “this is the first time that a social media company’s argument that it can censor user speech has been rejected by a court.”
Taylor describes himself as a “race realist” and claims that races are “not equal”, but his attorney says this trial is not about Taylor’s particular views.
“Our lawsuit is not about whether Taylor is right or wrong,” Peters said. “It’s about whether Twitter and other technology companies have the right to ban individuals from using their services based on their perceived viewpoints and affiliations.”
Twitter says it’s not engaged in political censorship but it’s clearly run by Liberal donors and activists. It says its algorithms for policing “healthy conversations” aren’t politically motivated, it’s clear that their effect is the censorship of conservatives.
Twitter’s software engineers admitted on hidden camera to liberal bias involving Twitter's shadow-banning policies, according to Project Veritas.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">And these engineers who confirm Twitter certainly DID shadow ban…is this not even a form of evidence to you? What about the recent attempts by Twitter to hide the accounts of <a href="https://twitter.com/GOPChairwoman?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@GOPChairwoman</a> or <a href="https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DonaldJTrumpJr</a>'s spokesperson?<br><br>Does this really not concern you at all? <a href="https://t.co/rjlTsMNEKP">pic.twitter.com/rjlTsMNEKP</a></p>— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) <a href="https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1022515591738007553?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 26, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
In addition, Peter Strzok was just fired as FBI Director.
“Strzok was under oath before Congress and he made statements that appeared to be false and refused to answer some questions, but he was going to get just a slap on the wrist,” said a former supervisory special agent from OPR adjudication, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the nature of their work. “There is absolutely no wiggle room when it comes to lack of candor in the FBI…unless you’re an SES (Senior Executive Service).
Strzok’s firing went well beyond texting about Trump. Strzok would have also been involved in the handling of the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) application to the FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court)…” The agent noted that Strzok was “well aware that he was lying by deception when they did not include the information on who paid for the dossier and (that) Bruce Ohr was back-channeling information for a discredited source.”
Yet, this man gets his twitter account verified within a day of setting it up and sending out a “go fund me” tweet. Twitter claims verification of accounts is on hold. Why is it on hold for conservatives but I see it being set up for Liberals? I have asked for a verified account numerous times with no response. This is liberal bias.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-14/twitter-to-face-claims-by-white-advocate-over-banned-accounts; https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/06/18/california-judge-rules-twitter-can-be-sued-for-falsely-advertising-free-speech/amp/; https://saraacarter.com/the-real-reasons-peter-strzok-was-fired-from-the-fbi/
<b>By: Lexy </b>
<b><i>On Twitter? Follow me:</i></b>
<strong><span style="color:red;">Have Information? Message me!</span></strong>