By Savannah Smith  |  07-23-2018   News
Photo credit: thoughtpick.com

Facebook’s vague, arbitrary, if not senseless or outright double-standards implementation of its supposed guidelines claimed yet another victim. The popular social media platform is being hit for censoring a feminist campaign group accused of “transphobia.”

Facebook temporarily blocked links to the website of Woman’s Place UK over the weekend. The group ardently campaigns for women-only spaces. They also raise concerns about transgender people being able to self-identify as women. Facebook cited supposed user “safety” because the feminist campaign group’s website was “malicious” as the reason behind its move to block it.

The group’s supporters slammed Facebook’s unjustifiable clampdown, describing the move as a “disgrace” and also hit the site for “suppressing free speech.”

Related Coverage: https://thegoldwater.com/news/28143-Facebook-Bug-Exposes-14-Million-Users-Private-Profiles

One dismayed user even tweeted: "Only fake news and hard Brexit is allowed on @facebook. Women's rights are bad, m'kay."

The clampdown may have been triggered by a Twitter post from user @mimmymum, whose profile shows the account belongs to Helen, who says she is "passionate about acceptance for transgender people & #trans kids."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Thread: Please read and share widely. This nonsense has to stop. Thank you. <a href="https://t.co/T9sQ9hYjZN">https://t.co/T9sQ9hYjZN</a></p>&mdash; Womans_Place_UK (@Womans_Place_UK) <a href="https://twitter.com/Womans_Place_UK/status/1020223851194724353?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Related Coverage: https://thegoldwater.com/news/30551-Facebook-Apologizes-For-Flagging-Declaration-Of-Independence-As-Hate-Speech

The tweet included screenshots that prompted pro-transgender users to report Woman's Place UK's group to Facebook for allegedly breaching its guidelines.

Helen also accused the group and their site of propagating transphobia and excluding trans women.

And just like that, Facebook acted swiftly to block the site. It makes one wonder what is their process- if ever there’s one- of addressing complaints and meting out punishments against users. Is there any credible investigation to credibly address these complaints? Is questioning or asking the other party’s side even considered at all? Do all sides matter, or is it only a matter of who screams the loudest? One wonders when will this madness of Facebook end? Or without a clear system in place, where is this leading to?

Related Coverage: https://thegoldwater.com/news/15854-The-Twitter-Shadow-Ban-Liberalism-Censoring-Opposing-Political-Opinions

In this case, are transgender voices are more important than pro-women advocates? How does Facebook even draw the line between hate content and just perceived or exaggerated claims of such?

Judith Green, of Woman’s Place UK said it was difficult to contact Facebook to discuss why it had blocked the links.: “We regard it as a fairly serious interference in democratic discussion. This is about women’s voices being able to be heard.”

The group also accused social media sites of deliberately "obstructing" and "hiding" its posts and alleged that its detractors are setting up fake profiles as part of a smear campaign against its nationwide events and public meetings.

Source:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/6841801/facebook-block-womens-rights-group-transphobia/

Twitter: #MAGA #KeepAmericaGreat! #UK #Facebook #FacebookCensorship #WomensRights #TrannyRights #DoubleStandards
Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
3 Comment/s


Anonymous No. 32185 1532382498

The only reason we are still seeing this crap is bc not enough dummies deleted their fakebook accts.

Tab No. 32191 1532384887

@ Anonymous No. 32185

exactly! the stinking jew who runs the place should be holocausted.

Anonymous No. 32187 1532394309
gotta love when libs smack down libs
What do you think about this article?
Name
Comment *
Image