Former Director of National Intelligence is again denying the allegations that the Obama Regime unmasked American citizens per intelligence reports, despite the fact that several Obama officials have confirmed that this occurred.
The American people are fully aware that the Obama Regime engaged in such illicit unmasking efforts, as it was confirmed by former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Powers back in October, although she attempted to claim that “someone else” made the requests in her name.
During a sworn testimony to the House Intelligence Committee, the UN Ambassador argued that she wasn't responsible for the unmasking, of which a report has confirmed occurred at least 260 times during Obama's last year in office.
James Clapper appeared with Hugh Hewitt for an interview where he denied the facts, however, and seems to suggest that either the reports are inaccurate or that Powers is lying, either way, there are criminal implications involved.
Hugh Hewitt asked about Samantha Powers explanation, where Clapper adamantly denied the unmasking requests, in what seems to be an effort to protect himself from potential criminal charges as part of several ongoing Investigations.
“If that happened, if people usurped the authority to request unmaskings, would that concern you, Director Clapper?” Hewitt asked of the former DNI.
“Yeah, it would,” said James Clapper. “I don’t know quite how that would happen, you know, because the only way you can make an unmasking request is that you have authorized access to the report in question in the first place. So I don’t know how that, quite how that would work.”
James Clapper also confessed that he “made unmasking requests every couple of weeks,” but this doesn't explain the logic behind a United Nations Ambassador making 260 of them herself.
Clapper then tried to justify the very unmasking he claimed didn't happen, which is incredibly intriguing in and of itself.
“I’d come across reports that and I felt, you know, that it was my duty to understand, my obligation as the director of national intelligence…,” Clapper argued. “…To understand these interactions when U.S. persons were interacting with valid foreign intelligence targets, particularly Russians, our adversary.”
There's still zero evidence that any Russian collusion occurred on behalf of anyone within the Trump campaign, or that anyone tied to the Administration had any illegal contacts with anyone in Russia during the election.
In fact, the entire current investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller is based upon incidents which occurred several years prior to the Trump campaign.
Although it's arguable that the Robert Mueller witch hunt itself was planned prior to Trump taking office, as a means of covering up the illicit actions of both the Obama Regime, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and countless other potential crimes committed in their efforts to take down a sitting President both before his inauguration as a candidate and afterwards.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iFNNdYHlEEE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Barack Obama's administration per Samantha Powers averaged more than one request for every working day in 2016 – and even sought additional information on the identities of American citizens in the days leading up to President Trump’s inauguration, multiple sources close to the matter told<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/20/samantha-power-sought-to-unmask-americans-on-almost-daily-basis-sources-say.html"> Fox News </a>at the time.
<blockquote>”Two sources, who were not authorized to speak on the record, said the requests to identify Americans whose names surfaced in foreign intelligence reporting, known as unmasking, exceeded 260 last year. One source indicated this occurred in the final days of the Obama White House.”</blockquote>
The House Intelligence Committee Chairman Representative Devin Nunes (R-CA) sent a letter to the new Director of National Intelligence, Daniel Coats, in which he expressed concerns for what he labeled as “leaks from Obama Administration officials” to try and smear the Trump Administration, as well as seeking the identities of those in the Administration without explanation as per what that information would be used for.
<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/790b2ef29661d3c5feac15e8c482d848b66354a21fc8940afa279c2fa1fc37b0.jpg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">
<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/978dc7983eff2e485cc7630d5ebd527d091d1d7e0cedc4efef279e1ea5b03b24.jpg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">
<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Letter from Representative Nunes to DNI Coats. Credit: <a href="https://www.house.gov/Representatives"> House Intelligence Committee.</a></span>
With those intelligence reports showcasing that the Obama Regime not only used UN Ambassador Samantha Powers to abuse the system in acquiring information on those in the Trump campaign and Trump transition team, there were also countless leaks to the media, which would mean that classified information had been printed by the press because of the illicit unmasking.
There is still, <i>to this very day,</i> no explanation as to why all of these unmaskings took place. It's safe to assume that the Obama Regime wanted to attempt at harming the Trump campaign through the media in an effort to allow Hillary Clinton to win the election.
After Trump won and became the President-elect, it then became an ongoing effort from Obama's officials to continue to perform the same unmaskings dating up until the inauguration, which raised eyebrows in the House Intelligence Committee as per why such information would be necessary without any criminal investigation occurring or reasoning for the Democrats to need these identities in the first place.
You can't simply abuse the American intelligence community's resources to further your party's goals of subverting the incoming President, but this appears to be exactly what occurred and it happened at least once a day if not more. Based on the total of at least 260 times Samantha Powers sent requests for unmasking, it seems to suggest there was a plan being set in motion to build a case against those in the Trump Administration prior to the President's inauguration.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-47JqamZ4JQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Some would suggest that was exactly what Obama had planned all along, and there's a series of text messages which have been released from the once Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division, FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, which prove that Barack Hussein Obama not only knew what the Federal Bureau of Investigation was doing in regards to covering up the Hillary Clinton case but also demanded updates on what the current status of the investigation was.
Peter Strzok and Page discussed serving to "protect the country from the menace" of Trump "enablers," and the possibility of an "insurance policy" against the "risk" of a Trump Presidency.
What exactly is an "insurance policy" America? This could explain the desires of the Obama Administration to unmask those in the Trump campaign and eventual Administration.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/m4vZ6saiqT0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Despite the facts showing that this unmasking occurred, James Clapper is determined to deny it.
The most obvious reason is that Clapper himself will be found to have committed perjury and that his former boss Barack Obama could see himself issued a subpoena as well as possible charges against many others within his ranks.
Additional Sources or Relevant Information:
<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>
~<b>Send Me An E-Mail!</b>
<b><i>Follow Me On Twitter!</i></b>
<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><i>Be Sure To Share Our Articles!</i></span>
<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><b>The Goldwater</b></span>