By Red Pill  |  04-25-2018   News
Photo credit: Renegade Tribune

A federal judge has now issued an order to the Trump Administration demanding that the continuation of DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) applications continue - declaring the Trump Administration’s allowing of DACA to expire as “unlawful” - despite the fact that DACA was never a law in the first place - and sets a 90 day precedent for a new reason to end DACA.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A federal judge gave <a href="https://twitter.com/DHSgov?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DHSgov</a> 90 days to explain why the DACA program should be discontinued, in a blow to the Trump administration. <a href="https://t.co/i1XOklMpaO">https://t.co/i1XOklMpaO</a></p>&mdash; Twitter Moments (@TwitterMoments) <a href="https://twitter.com/TwitterMoments/status/988957480272064513?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The mental disorder known as liberalism has infested the minds of the Judicial branch, as well as the Legislative branch, but fortunately, Americans voted to save the Executive branch from a full throttle of cancerous progressivism.

Despite this, a federal judge believes that he can overrule the Trump Administration allowing the expiration of the DACA Executive Order from Barack Obama.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">INSANE! A federal judge has just ruled that the Trump administration MUST accept new DACA applicants, rejecting Trump’s plan to end enlistments.<br><br>This is absurd, a leftist judge declaring President Trump allow new illegal aliens into Obama’s unconstitutional program!<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NoDACA?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NoDACA</a></p>&mdash; Mike (@mike_Zollo) <a href="https://twitter.com/mike_Zollo/status/988962177431285761?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Many argued that the original Executive Order for DACA was Unconstitutional in the first place as it contradicts legislation for immigration laws which already existed, but Judge John Bates concluded as per his ruling that the end of DACA was to be considered as "arbitrary and capricious,” due to what he says is a failure of the Department of Homeland Security to "adequately explain its conclusion that the program was unlawful."

Judge Bates also accused the government of providing "meager legal reasoning" to support its decision, essentially acting as if he has the power to overrule the President of the United States of America.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So a federal judge can overrule Trump&#39;s efforts to end DACA, and make the government accept new applications ? <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> needs to remake these courts with America First people. This is a disgrace. Lawlessness is being protected by the very people who should love Justice.</p>&mdash; Oak-Town☢Unfiltered™ (@hrtablaze) <a href="https://twitter.com/hrtablaze/status/988970651770748928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That's what has continued to occur all throughout the Trump Administration, as liberal judges and their mental disorder known as liberalism try to subvert the will of the American people. It's setting a dangerous precedent for future generations, giving the courtroom the authority to outwit a sitting President.

No doubt the Trump Administration will fight the ruling as this case will inevitably end up before the Supreme Court, albeit Congress needs to revisit current immigration laws and redefine them to remove their vagueness, and specific areas of concern must be addressed when this happens again.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So lets get this straight.. A federal judge is telling the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DHS?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DHS</a> it has 90 days to provide him with a more compelling reason for rolling back <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DACA?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DACA</a>, an Obama, unconstitutional exec. order, otherwise he could order its restoration. Are all federal judges brain-dead? Apparently.</p>&mdash; Kevin W (@kwilli1046) <a href="https://twitter.com/kwilli1046/status/988952728016707584?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Judge Bates is actually an appointee of George W. Bush for the US District Court in the District of Columbia, showcasing again how the establishment GOP, also known as “eGOP,” has continued to defy President Trump on every chance that's presented before them.

Bates also issued a 90-day delay to his ruling, arguing that the time delay is intended "to allow the agency an opportunity to better explain its rescission."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How can Trump’s DACA decision be called unlawful when there was no law creating DACA in the first place? Help me out here</p>&mdash; Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) <a href="https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/988964640205008896?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Justice Department has already slammed the ruling, along with the DACA program stating that it's an "unlawful circumvention of Congress," and that the DOJ will not stop fighting to restore the rule of law by protecting Americans.

"The Department of Homeland Security, therefore, acted within its lawful authority in deciding to wind down DACA in an orderly manner," spokesman Devin O'Malley said in a statement. "Promoting and enforcing the rule of law is vital to protecting a nation, its borders, and its citizens. The Justice Department will continue to vigorously defend this position, and looks forward to vindicating its position in further litigation."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">We cant expect a better life for a country where government treats illegal immigrants far better than CITIZENS.<br>All DACA recipients had time to become legal, but instead decided to live off the “dreamer” welfare system that was illegally put into place. We own ILLEGALS NOTHING. <a href="https://t.co/8SYUrvy0rN">pic.twitter.com/8SYUrvy0rN</a></p>&mdash; 👑💥 Hanna 💥👑 (@polishprincessh) <a href="https://twitter.com/polishprincessh/status/988474071653453825?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 23, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Texas and many border states had argued that DACA was not only Unconstitutional but that they would not stop fighting the Executive Order until it was defeated, to help curb the countless illegal immigrants who had settled in their communities at great cost to the taxpayer, an estimated $120 billion annually.

As a reminder, President Trump's proposed “Border Wall” would only cost $25 billion, saving taxpayers nearly $100 billion annually, and Congress has thus far failed to finance the project.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It’s pretty funny that a Federal Judge thinks Trump’s decision on DACA is unlawful when DACA is unlawful in the first place.<br><br>So Trump is unlawful for trying to reverse an unlawful program. Yeah, ok.</p>&mdash; Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) <a href="https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/988969174784331777?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Judge Bates continued to argue against the border states saying that the Texas courts which were to halt DACA had an argument that "was so implausible that it fails even under the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard.”

Despite this opinion from the obviously anti-Trump judge, there's no doubt going to be repercussions from Texas courts when they issue a challenge in the coming days and weeks.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">All DACA recipients please report to Judge John Bates&#39;s house.<br><br>You&#39;re his responsibility now. <a href="https://t.co/AERqZaDg6v">pic.twitter.com/AERqZaDg6v</a></p>&mdash; Mike (@Fuctupmind) <a href="https://twitter.com/Fuctupmind/status/988975769824186369?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This battle is far from over, and Americans have already spoken loud and clear that DACA is not in their interests or the interests of this nation.

The Trump Administration now has 90 days to issue a new plan or logic behind scrapping DACA as per this ruling.

Additional Sources or Relevant Information:

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/immigration-reform/third-federal-judge-issues-strongest-order-yet-backing-daca-n868866

<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>

~<b>Send Me An E-Mail!</b>

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<b><i>Follow Me On Twitter!</i></b>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillU">@IWillRedPillU</a>

<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><i>Be Sure To Share Our Articles!</i></span>

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><b>The Goldwater</b></span>

Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
4 Comment/s


James Allbrook No. 24112 1524635440

Liberals are RAPING this country!!!!

Anonymous No. 24130 1524652472

This president is the biggest pussy ever if hillary had won id be killing libshits right now but this coward lets ever happen without a fight

Anonymous No. 24137 1524656616

Where is the Federal Judge Review board?

Filing a Judicial Conduct or Disability Complaint Against a Federal Judge.

http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-conduct-disability/faqs-filing-judicial-conduct-or-disability-complaint

EJ No. 24154 1524663925

This liberal judge needs to be impeached for obstruction of justice. He has no business being on a bench.

What do you think about this article?
Name
Comment *
Image

The Slow Murder Of Alfie Evans