By: Earnest Jones | 02-13-2017 | News
Photo credit: The Goldwater

Hillary Clinton’s Big Donors Demand For A Dispassionate, Centralized Analysis Of What Happened

Hillary Clinton’s donors are demanded for a dispassionate, centralized analysis of how Hillary Clinton misread polling data and the mood in battleground states following her failed campaign.

The donors were sure that there was another reason that led to Clinton’s failure apart from the alleged Kremlin hacking that forced her to misfire on messaging and buy ads in bizarre places such as Arizona.

In a report made by Alan Patricof as he addressed POLITICO, many people believed that the campaign was not run as well as it could have been. A report made by one of the major donors emphasized that he and his fellow donors decided to cut off donations until the Democratic Party figured out what exactly ails them.

In response to the donor’s reaction, Hillary Clinton allies made it clear that they intended to collect and analyze their own data as they also planned to present a campaign autopsy at a gathering in Florida the week after Donald Trump’s inauguration.

However, the sleazy propagandist David Brock organized a gathering around the time when Donald Trump’s inauguration was taking place. Nevertheless, it was the best way to spend the inaugural weekend as they plotted on how to kick Trump’s ass.

In an email that Brock wrote to the donors, the gathering was meant to set a platform for the Democratic donors to hear from a broad and diverse group of leaders about the next steps for progressives under Trump’s administration. However, Hillary Clinton’s strategist James Carville referred the meeting as a confab for getting together plans to resist President Trump.

The conference had sessions that included building a lasting winning coalition, policy, strategy, campaign tactics of the future that included social media, polling, and targeting.

It’s unfortunate that Clinton’s side generated more than double what Trump’s side raised, yet the Clinton campaign team did not accept blame for the shocking defeat. Clinton side generated $703.7 million while Trump’s side generated $322.4 million

Clinton’s campaign shot down questions in a teleconference with donors about whether they should have run a more populist campaign with a greater appeal to the angry white voters, they pointed out to exit polls that showed how Hillary Clinton beat Trump on the issue of the economy. They emphasized that internal polling from the month of May indicated that attacking Trump on matters concerning his temperament was a more effective strategy with a strong message. However, it turns out that they were wrong. Clinton’s communications director Jennifer Palmieri termed her candidate’s defeat as the most devastating loss in the history of American politics.

Following the disgusting defeat, Hillary Clinton blamed an unprecedented Russian plot to swing the election, the FBI Director James Comey, while her flak Jess Mcintosh blamed women with internalized misogyny who could not make an effort to elect the first female president. Clinton’s advisor blamed sexism and misogyny and the Bernie Bros. The campaign chairman John Podesta blamed the media for giving the Trump a pass.

Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
0 comment/s
What do you think about this article?
Comment *

Recent News

Popular Stories