By Red Pill  |  10-28-2017   News
Photo credit: Da Vid | drawception.com

There's an epidemic of social justice warrior narratives in America that have not only turned society into a safe space of anguish and simple minded eggshells that the world must walk on; but it's emasculated men emotionally and reduced a once proud warrior culture to inefficient cowards.

In some societies across the world you can actually face a criminal charge or a lawsuit over offending people.

Yes I'm serious. Honestly who would doubt it in the modern world?

Let's start with a case from nearly a decade ago, where a married Christian couple who were Hotel owners, Ben and Sharon Vogelenzang, were actually arrested by police after a Muslim patron at their hotel complained of being offended for the couple engaging in a religious discussion at their business.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/991367c664523258630080d20592e76c8b7dc8d54acb4a02b7b6ed09e7ef0f2d.jpg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

The couple <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1214666/Christian-hotel-owners-hauled-court-defending-beliefs-discussion-Muslim-guest.html">charged under public order laws</a> after the Muslim complained to police and they were charged with using <i>”threatening, abusive or insulting words that were religiously aggravated”</i>.

At their hotel there was an organized discussion and debate over history and religious figureheads, to which the topics were wide and on a basis of every religion.

Once they came to the discussion of Islamic culture, they suggested that Mohammed, the founder of Islam, was a warlord and that traditional Muslim dress for women was a form of bondage.

This is actually true. In fact, Mohammed was actually a pedophile. Islam is a barbaric culture, which still to this day oppresses women and a variety of other people.

However the couple after offending a Muslim woman, who was staying in their hotel at the time, were not only arrested and charged under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 and Section 31 (1) (c) and (5) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998; but were later sued by the Muslim woman for damages.

Now this is just one case, and I'm making an example. Let's discuss more about America since that case was in the UK.

For starters, did you know that in Virginia there is actually an <i>”anti-dueling”</i> law on the books which uses the <i>“fighting words”</i> <a href="https://www.virginiadefamationlawyer.com/2012/08/virginias-insulting-words-statute.html">statute as per Virginia law </a>at Section 8.01-45 of the doctrine that has evolved from the dueling order in 1810 into a modern day anti-defamation law.

Some of you will say, “but the First Amendment protects me regardless of who I offend”, and well, it should.

However two historic cases sort of nullifies that argument which allows the defamation suits to go forward as per Supreme Court rulings if you can prove that you were offended in a manner that meets those decisions.

To recover in a private lawsuit brought under § 8.01-45, the words used must not only be insults, but they must be fighting words that “tend to violence and breach of the peace.”

The United States Supreme Court has defined fighting words as “those personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction.”

The case of a man who was sued for wearing a jacket bearing the words "Fuck the Draft" in a corridor of the Los Angeles Courthouse during the Vietnam era helped set the groundwork for this, and <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/403/15/case.html">Cohen v. California</a>, 403 U.S. 15, 20 (1971).

The Supreme Court later expanded the definition by clarifying that provocation of “immediate” or “imminent” violence was required before mere insults could fall outside the protection of the First Amendment.

The case of white merchants being boycotted by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People in

<a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/458/886/case.html">N.A.A.C.P. v. Claiborne Hardware Co.</a>, 458 U.S. 886, 928 (1982) also helped to define these laws.

It shifted the meaning that in order for one to violate the law or be held accountable that an “insult” had to be “actionable” in order to sue.

There's another incident in New Jersey that has further tested these laws.

An Asian woman who called CVS Pharmacy and placed an order, said she was viciously offended by the actions of the store when she came to pick up her order.

The woman, of Korean descent says that when she <a href="https://google.com">This goes to google</a>checked her receipt upon leaving it said the words <i>”Ching Chong Lee”</i> in place of her name.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/fad2795258d09dfa19d14cf206f26779337b9715805ba519fe819e5c492b61df.jpg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

Her attorney claims that her client, Hyun Lee gave her full name online when she placed her order but that when she arrived the receipt used the derogatory slang because of her Asian heritage.

She sued because she was offended at what she called a “racial injustice”, and said that for the low sum of $1 million dollars when would quickly move away from being offended.

Seriously. This is the society we live in. I'm not sure how the hell this woman feels that two words on a receipt were worth a million dollars but apparently that's the type of issues we face in America for someone being butt hurt over an obvious electronic mistake.

In fact who's to say she didn't place the order this way to begin with in order to sue? That tends to happen a lot.

“CVS touts that they make $300 billion a year on their filings, then the $1 million should be enough to teach them a lesson that their employees should not be getting away with this,” her attorney actually said.

Let's say it did happen. She suffered no actual damages. She may have been offended and should have took her business elsewhere.

How did she suffer though? What pain or agony did she endure? I mean really?

These types of lawsuits hurt the rest of us. You don't think that multi-billion dollar company is just going to pay out that loss and not make it’s money back, do you?

Didn't think so. The bill is passed along to the consumers.

Moving along, let's get to Black Lives Matter, and show how others use being offended both in and out of the courtroom to gain what I call <i>”sympathy donations”</i>.

DeRay Mckesson, self proclaimed “leader” of Black Lives Matter began a childish rant over the Planet of the Apes film, who he said is intentionally trying to depict blacks as apes.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/88ce3afb7fb73b8a37d4540140fd5bc6bd4a42c475afe35f0d313e2931cd2d3c.png" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

This is laughable to say the least, but on social media he actually gained a lot of support from the opportunistic negro who profits from playing a victim, even going as far as suggesting that the film's producers were trying to depict him because one of the apes wore a blue vest which he called his trademark.

Even the ignorant Tariq Nasheed, who is a <a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/3892-Tariq-Nasheed-An-Anti-White-Black-Supremacist">professional race-baiting Anti-White Black Supremacist</a> chimed in on these issues.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Does the new Planet of the Apes poster have racially coded messages?Notice the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BlackLivesMatter?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BlackLivesMatter</a> symbolism.Notice the ape with the blue vest <a href="https://t.co/8dnr42OxjK">pic.twitter.com/8dnr42OxjK</a></p>&mdash; Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) <a href="https://twitter.com/tariqnasheed/status/884454510730502144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 10, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Meanwhile the hard working men and women of every color including blacks denounce this ignorance and race-baiting for profit. Can you imagine how many liberal idiots donate to this moron’s cause?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">You&#39;re outraged because they&#39;re recreating the look of the original ape in 1968. You don&#39;t own wearing blue vests man. Grow up. <a href="https://t.co/XF9b0DurVt">pic.twitter.com/XF9b0DurVt</a></p>&mdash; Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) <a href="https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/884608172920422401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 11, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yes, DeRay Mckesson actually was that much of a narcissist to believe that a 1968 blue vest worn in the original Planet of the Apes film which was used again in the remake was somehow trying to depict him (he wears a blue vest as a trademark) as being an ape.

Ignorance folks. Complete ignorance.

Let's also keep in mind that DeRay Mckesson and Black Lives Matter just won a lawsuit against Baton Rouge Police by a Federal Judge over them being arrested during a riot that they started.

No, I'm serious. <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/settlement-would-award-baton-rouge-protesters-up-to-1000/2017/10/27/789daf3c-baeb-11e7-9b93-b97043e57a22_story.html">Baton Rouge Police and the City must now pay nearly $200,000 to the 200 people they arrested for rioting</a> after the Alton Sterling shooting, which is anywhere from $500 to $1000 per person. The city is literally being forced to pay for arresting criminals.

Clown world.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/03fb601620c587c9d4fce28848e32288dfe9727a4abd77ef979d85b3ef4f11f9.jpg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

Anti-American, Anti-White, bigoted terrorists like Black Lives Matter literally burn down cities and incites violence against innocent civilians and police officers, and they are supported by major networks and companies like ESPN.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">ESPN takes the time to interview an anti-American College Football player who was kicked off his team for kneeling.<br>F*ck him, and f*ck ESPN. <a href="https://t.co/4aybb0Qdbg">https://t.co/4aybb0Qdbg</a></p>&mdash; Red Pill (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/924341867801702400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 28, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I actually just showed an example of this today. I found an ESPN Senior Writer who was promoting a story about a College Football player who was kicked off the team for kneeling.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is <a href="https://twitter.com/espn?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@espn</a> Senior Writer, showing violence from <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BlackLivesMatter?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BlackLivesMatter</a> (burnt car) in a literal riot scene against police as his banner?<br>Wtf? <a href="https://t.co/GbTPHtaeek">pic.twitter.com/GbTPHtaeek</a></p>&mdash; Red Pill (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/924343484701650945?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 28, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Now this was ESPN promoting an Anti-American athlete who was served with American Justice being knocked off his team, but then I looked a bit closer at the ESPN writer's Verified account on Twitter.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Triggered 😂🤣<br>Anti-White Black Supremacist Terrorists don&#39;t like being called out. <a href="https://t.co/KriUakC9Cw">pic.twitter.com/KriUakC9Cw</a></p>&mdash; Red Pill (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/924343690184839168?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 28, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

To my shock, he actually had a banner on his page of a burnt down car in what looks like it was the Baltimore riots (I could be wrong since BLM do so much criminal violence it could have been a dozen other locations), but this writer for ESPN was glorifying the violence and then blocked me when I called him out for it.

Not that I care, but Twitter refuses to Verify my account or the accounts of any of our writers from The Goldwater and hundreds of other right leaning journalists on their website, but they'll allow this Anti-White racist to be verified?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One of his &quot;liked&quot; tweets <a href="https://t.co/q9mhFoUhCo">pic.twitter.com/q9mhFoUhCo</a></p>&mdash; The 🐸 Canadien (@The_Canadien) <a href="https://twitter.com/The_Canadien/status/924344989957619712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 28, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

A reply to my tweet checked his previous “likes” on his account and noticed he indeed was liking Anti-White tweets.

So you ask, how can a person profit from being offended? Take a look.

They can sue you for having a religious discussion that offends them, even leading to your arrest, sue your business over what is a clear digital error for a million dollars, use the race card and the sympathy card to make money through donations, actually burn down a city and attack police and get hired by a major company like ESPN…

I don't think I need to continue. This is the real plight of our time. The culture war, and we need to fight and win this battle for our children and our children's children.

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<i>On Twitter:</i>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou">@IWillRedPillYou</a>

Tips? Info? Send me a message!

Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
2 Comment/s


Anonymous No. 10508 1509225889

one set of rules for the rulers, another for the ruled. and the subjects are subjected to different sets of rules based on identity. this is all to create more dissension and division so we're easier to herd.

Anonymous No. 10509 1509226700

The author or readers may fail to realize that Women got leaps and bounds ahead of men in the arena of satisfaction of life by this behavior. It would be illogical to understand why men have weaponized the tactic and will continue to do so.

What do you think about this article?
Name
Comment *
Image
12-08-2017   Science 9 Comment/s

Gene Linked To Homosexuality Found

12-07-2017   News 6 Comment/s

Lord's Prayer to be Changed by Pope